Those looking for proof that Google is far from perfect need only look as far as my hit counter.
Apparently I’m the best source of information for “java swt” (rather than Eclipse’s SWT page) and “kim jong Il livejournal” (rather than the actual site). I’m also second link for “nih syndrome”. Strangeness.
My guess is that Google must have some sort of temporal variable it takes into account (along with “site scores” and other stuff) and I just happened to be the last person to write about those subjects. Does that necessarily make me the best source of information? Of course not … but I’m flattered Google thinks so. I must have some kickass Google karma.